Nico Iamaleava's Holdout, Judge Wilken's Settlement Feedback, Johnson v. NCAA Update & More | Newsletter #319
Keep up to date on all of our newsletters and content by checking out past Optimum Sports Consulting Newsletters, and following us on Twitter!
This Monday Newsletter includes:
1. Iamaleava's NIL Holdout
2. Pushback on the NCAA’s $2.8 Billion Settlement
3. JT Toppin Returns to School With $4M Deal
4. UConn’s 12th Title and Women’s Basketball NIL Growth
5. West Virginia NIL Law Push
6. Arizona State’s NIL Recruiting Momentum
7. Quick Hits, Legal Updates, and What’s Next for NIL
Major News
Nico Iamaleava Reportedly Holds Out Over NIL Dispute
Tennessee quarterback Nico Iamaleava, a former five-star recruit and expected starter, reportedly skipped several team meetings and practices last week.
The absence has been attributed to a breakdown in NIL compensation negotiations, where Iamaleava and his representation are seeking a revised agreement more reflective of his market value and expected playing role.
His original NIL agreement, reported to be worth over $2 million annually, was brokered early in his recruitment. New quarterback market trends suggest elite starters are receiving significantly more.
Tennessee’s coaching staff has remained mostly quiet on the situation, with Head Coach Josh Heupel stating the team is "focused on players who are committed to our program."
This incident is drawing national attention as potentially the first publicized NIL holdout, setting a precedent for player leverage in ongoing and future NIL negotiations.
Industry experts believe this could lead to calls for more formalized NIL contracts and collective bargaining frameworks in major conferences.
👉 Click here to learn more
Judge Pushes Back on $2.8 Billion NCAA Settlement
Federal Judge Claudia Wilken has expressed concerns over fairness and execution in the NCAA's proposed $2.8 billion settlement intended to resolve multiple NIL-related antitrust lawsuits.
The original proposal would create a revenue-sharing system beginning in 2025 and distribute backpay to former athletes dating back to 2016. Each school would be permitted to share up to $20.5M annually.
Judge Wilken’s primary objections focused on vague language in the allocation process and whether the deal truly compensates non-revenue sport athletes equitably.
Public criticism has also mounted. High-profile athletes like Olivia Dunne have publicly questioned the fairness of valuation methods used in the settlement distribution, noting discrepancies between athlete brand value and projected payments.
There is also uncertainty over how Title IX compliance would be maintained with unrestricted NIL distributions tied to athletic revenue.
The NCAA and plaintiffs have been ordered to resubmit a revised proposal addressing proportionality, athlete eligibility guidelines, and long-term monitoring of disbursements.
👉 Click here to learn more
JT Toppin Returning to Texas Tech After $4M NIL Agreement
JT Toppin, a projected second-round NBA Draft pick and All-Big 12 performer, has announced his return to Texas Tech after securing a reported $4 million NIL deal.
His NIL package includes guaranteed income, brand endorsements, and profit-sharing incentives with a local real estate firm, representing one of the most creative multi-source deals to date.
According to On3, Toppin’s NIL valuation has skyrocketed in the last three months due to postseason performance and social media engagement.
His decision to stay in school highlights a growing trend where top college athletes are choosing to continue building their brand and income in college, rather than entering professional leagues with smaller guaranteed rookie contracts.
Texas Tech is planning to center its entire 2025–26 marketing campaign around Toppin and several other returners, leveraging his profile to boost ticket sales and donor engagement.
This deal marks another example of collectives using professional deal structures to retain star athletes, especially in high-revenue sports like men’s basketball.
👉 Click here to learn more
Other Notable Stories to Follow
UConn Women’s Basketball Wins 12th National Title – The team’s 82–59 win over South Carolina drew over 8 million viewers. Azzi Fudd was named MOP. NIL interest around Fudd and other UConn players is expected to rise.
🔗 LINKWest Virginia Advocates for NIL Legislative Reform – Head Coach Rich Rodriguez and AD Wren Baker are pushing for updated state NIL law to improve WVU’s flexibility in athlete support.
🔗 LINKArizona State Sees NIL Recruiting Boost – Under new AD Graham Rossini, ASU landed a top-10 men’s basketball recruiting class. NIL infrastructure improvements credited with helping land high-profile players.
🔗 LINK
What’s Coming Up Next for NIL
April 18: NCAA Division I Council meets to review proposed NIL inducement guidelines
April 22: California Assembly will hold a hearing on state-run NIL collectives
May 1: Spring transfer portal closes for football
Legal Updates
Johnson v. NCAA
The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a 2021 ruling that scholarship athletes can be considered employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
This decision allows former Villanova football players to pursue back pay and opens the door for broader employment rights across college sports.
If not overturned by the Supreme Court, the ruling could force universities to begin treating athletes in revenue-generating sports as employees — complete with wages, workers’ compensation, and collective bargaining rights.
The NCAA argues this classification undermines amateurism, but legal scholars note it aligns with labor standards in other industries that benefit from commercial activity.
Experts believe this case will influence the trajectory of athlete rights litigation nationwide, including NIL-related governance frameworks and federal labor protections.
🔗 Full Coverage
New NIL Antitrust Lawsuit
A former Pac-12 swimmer filed suit against the NCAA and her conference, alleging that collective media rights deals unlawfully restricted her ability to monetize her NIL.
The lawsuit points to policies preventing individual athletes from profiting off televised broadcasts, arguing these restrictions suppress earning potential and violate antitrust law.
This is the first known case to challenge centralized broadcast deals under the Sherman Act in a NIL context, potentially setting a major legal precedent.
Legal analysts believe this lawsuit could have implications for how schools negotiate future TV contracts, including whether athletes are due a share of media revenue.
If successful, it could open the door for athletes in Olympic sports to earn income from streaming, sponsorship overlays, and media syndication.
🔗 Full Coverage
State AG Reviews of NIL Collectives
Attorneys General in Texas, Georgia, and Florida have launched formal investigations into the tax-exempt status and operating practices of several NIL collectives.
These reviews stem from complaints about donor influence over recruiting decisions, lack of oversight, and whether the collectives are serving public interests as required by 501(c)(3) status.
Preliminary findings suggest some collectives may be funneling money directly to athletes without proper educational programming, which violates nonprofit regulations.
Legal experts expect some collectives may be forced to convert to for-profit models or face penalties, including tax fines and retroactive audits.
These investigations signal that state and federal regulators are increasingly focused on ensuring financial accountability and compliance in the NIL marketplace.
🔗 Full Coverage
Hear from Leaders on NIL
“The NIL holdout era is officially here. Players will test the boundaries, and programs better be ready.”
— @ByPatForde
🔗 Tweet“A $2.8B settlement that doesn’t guarantee anything to non-revenue athletes isn’t equity—it’s consolidation of power.”
— @rachelphipps
🔗 Tweet“This is why we fought for NIL—so athletes like Toppin can bet on themselves AND get paid.”
— @Andy_Staples
🔗 Tweet“The state-by-state NIL chaos is unsustainable. Congress will act or schools will lose athletes to more favorable markets.”
— @RossDellenger
🔗 Tweet“Players are announcing draft decisions through NIL announcements now. That’s not just branding—it’s the new business of college hoops.”
— @jeffborzello
🔗 Tweet
Thanks for Reading!
Keep up to date on all of our newsletters and content by checking out past Optimum Sports Consulting Newsletters and following us on Twitter!
The NIL landscape is insanity! Thanks for serving up full coverage!